Jewish loss is just a fraction of the the 42 million civilians who lost their lives during the WWII. Genocidal policies were carried out against the Romani people. Under the Generalplan Ost a large number of Slavic peoples were exterminated. The details of this were well known to those who could have taken action.

In 1994, 1.1 million Tutsis and Hutus were killed in Rwanda within just 100 days (that’s 10,000 murdered every day, 400 every hour, 7 every minute). Did the whole world know about that? Yes. Did anyone do anything? No. Sadly, but unless it happens to them or close to them, people generally do not care.

Anywho…

“Overwhelming probability”? How did you calculate that? We discuss the probability theory if you wish.

Overwhelming probability = probable truth. Anyhow its an interesting debate.I must go now as I just found sixpence under my pillow from the Tooth Fairy and have to skip down to the shops for some sweeties.

I *almost* agree… except for the word “any”.

I’m not saying that all experimental results are untrustworthy.
I’m saying there are certain types of experiments where they can’t be trusted (yet).
Experimental results are currently trustworthy for anything that resides 100% in the physical world / 3rd dimension…

Unfortunately, there are real places, people, and things that are not physical / 3rd dimensional. Experimental observations cannot be trusted when observing non-physical / Nth dimensional effects.

By way of example, people have died on the operating table – complete flatline with no brain activity – and been revived 20 minutes later. They claim to have been hovering over their bodies watching the entire procedure, AND they are able to tell the Doctors who did what, and when, and where they were standing, despite the fact that their eyes were closed, and brains were dead. This has been documented by attending doctors, who were dumbfounded.

As another example, some autistic savants claim see numbers as physical things. We know their brains are wired differently, because they’re autistic savants, but we have no idea how or why they can somehow see another dimension to numbers. We can’t, but that doesn’t mean those qualities don’t exist.

To go back to my original point about impartiality and the observer having an effect on the observed… Beliefs & thoughts & ideas are definitely not “nothings”. We know they exist because we all have them… but we can’t measure them. They are all excellent examples of N-dimensional non-physical things, and those things have qualities: frightening, hopeful, funny, etc.

If you’ll agree that non-physical things have properties, then it’s possible that they might interact with other non-physical things. It is in this way that pre-conceptions could affect whether or not you see ghosts. As they say “If you are open to it, you will experience it”.

This doesn’t mean that verifying & measuring is impossible… it just means that there are other variables entering into the equation; ones we have not been accounting for.

The Problem With Science isn’t that it clings to physicality and measurability, but that it insists that if we can’t measure something today, it musn’t exist, and must be bogus.

This statement is so riddled with fallacy, I don’t even know where to begin. For any experiment to be legitimized in any way the experimentor needs to remain impartial. 100′s of years of scientific progress should be tossed out the window if this isn’t to remain true.
The only thing that changes when the experiment is carried out by a so called “believer” is the interpretation of the results.
The credibility, such that it is in my estimation, of some of your ideas, took a plunge of leagues with that single sentence.
I used to think some of your beliefs were “just a bit kooky” now I’m wondering when kooky becomes fanatical and benign becomes harmful.